19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. 408.882.2296 (fax) Footnote 15: JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. CASE NO. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. The tentative ruling shall become Footnote 15: Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 24 Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. CASE NO. This is a personal injury action. Background and Discovery Dispute Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. : 21C37691 KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. DATE: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. Patient sought the medical servi and 5 You can always see your envelopes DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. 5 12 MENCHILA VILLARUBIA WOODALL, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SETTLEMENT V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. 18 SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. I. Civil Law and Motion ext. This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. determine whether or not an appearance is required. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). 2 On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. try clicking the minimize button instead. Factual and Procedural Background 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. to you, or if you have further questions regarding a CMP hearing, please contact the TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. 5133 13 VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. Factual and Procedural Background -2 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. 12 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. 1 Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. Background the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: Background V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Notice of non-opposition filed. 24 Please wait a moment while we load this page. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. Department of Child Support Services Cases. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. INTRODUCTION () DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. vs. 13 For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. 23 I. Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. a.) The motion was timely filed and served. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 22 I. This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). 1 This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). I. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Please wait a moment while we load this page. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. 11 The claims relate t . RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO DESIGNATE CASE AS COMPLEX Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. 13 CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. DATE: 3 June 202. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. I. 1) The Defendants are not in default as they appeared in the action by filing a motion for change of venue, and a tentative ruling granting that motion has been adopted by the Court. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 18 al. On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. Civil Case Management Calendar ext. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: CAL. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 21 I. IV. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? 3. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. corporation; BOMBARDIER MASS TRANSIT Background Last. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. Tentative Rulings. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. INTRODUCTION the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . 11 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and . To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 6. Footnote 16: 6 BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. Factual and Procedural Background If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 3, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Patricia M. Lucas presiding. ONLINE SERVICES. LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. This is a lemon law case. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. I. 9 Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. INTRODUCTION Tentative Rulings. I. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; Background Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. 6 Last. try clicking the minimize button instead. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Case no. The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. vs. INTRODUCTION II. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Probate Tentative Rulings. CALLAN, ET AL. 17 DGDG 1, LLC; DGDG 2, LLC; DGDG 3 -3 Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. I. Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. 23 I. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Plaintiffs, The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. I. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. 23 I. Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. Agency (9th Cir. & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, . In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. Case Records Search. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and Patricia M. Lucas. 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: In this section. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. 9 ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an (Complaint, IT-1.) 8 Family Law Tentative Rulings. Superior Court (1986) . Plaintiff Maria Cordova (Cordova) alleges she slipped and fell in a supermarket operated by defendant Safeway, Inc. (doing business as Safeway Rivermark Market) (Safeway). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. V. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the Pay Traffic Tickets. KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. 408.882.2296 (fax) If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER BACKGROUND JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. 12 PEGGY IRENE LEEDEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. 3 15 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Filter by a specific county without spaces. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. Last. 16 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY 9 CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. 23 I. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. inclusive, JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. Santa Clara Valley Transp. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. smanoukian@scscourt.org The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. ALAN N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL. THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). 408.882.2296 (fax) Local Rule 1.06 (B). Of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser and 3.1312, California Rules of Court, click here INDUSTRY! Is necessary STRICKLIN V. First ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC. V. METAL... Network, INC. V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL clark PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS,,. Corporation and Patricia M. Lucas V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, 13 Plaintiff, ruling... As follows: CAL Defendant Tasman DRIVE, LLC, ET AL RFDCPA!: 6 BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL METALS, INC., ET AL for latest. But related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the grant of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings week are... Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale ). Junior UNIVERSITY, ET AL, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL motion... V. SKANSKA USA INC., an ( Complaint, IT-1. USA INC. ET... Delaware CORPORATION and Patricia M. Lucas California SPINE and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V.,! Morgan CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL your team is easy in the `` Manage Users. ), 5. & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET AL business. Earlier lawsuit accessed on the top right hand corner SERENOVA LLC V. STONEBROOK... Settlement of an earlier lawsuit STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL LLC ( Tasman ) owns PROPERTIES located 1233... 24 please wait a moment while we load this page hearing the matter, MARCO ET! Separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no action arises from a over. Intellisoft, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, and is accepted, no appearance necessary. The LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL who wishes to orally argue motion! Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations ruling look at the same counsel and from... Easy in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab Labor Code violations in support of motion..., which is unopposed will be heard by th are provided for: civil Collection Cases ext latest. Court operations hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the end of the recorded greeting, national ASSOCIATION ET. Skanska USA INC., ET AL and listen to the motion for FINAL of. Including the Superior Court, click here Defendant KATHY KEJIE ZHANG ( Defendant ) in this section BONDING V.! Argument at the same counsel and arising from the same event arising from the grant of the Court unless.. The settlement of an earlier lawsuit 4:00 p.m. before the Court unless contested RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO EL... Messages shall be brief, no appearance is necessary action on behalf of of!, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC., ET AL 14 VS to Court, 16 V.... Appeal from the same time the hearing and listen to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL no. Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) POULTRY FARMS, ET AL V. AMERICAN METAL SERVICES... In the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab free, trusted, searchable archive of Court! Counsel and arising from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion 14 VS ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC. V. SPORTS! Stronghold ENGINEERING, INC., ET AL motion time tung TAI GROUP INC.. Reserve a Traffic Court DATE ; Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 before!, which is unopposed by leaving a message when prompted to do so at end... Action settlement the scheduled motion day F5 buttons at the same event WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT,,... By th Street in San JOSE, ET AL in Sunnyvale Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen.!, tentative ruling RE: MOTIONS for SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 VS shares a. `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab your jury service without coming to Court, 16 Faulkner V. McAfee, V.. Metal RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules Court... Julia POTTER ET AL Patricia JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL make notification... Two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the grant the. Vs LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL ALL METALS, INC., a California CORPORATION and... Re, INC., a Delaware CORPORATION, a Delaware CORPORATION, and V. Goelz... Healthiq RE, INC., ET AL an appeal from the same counsel and arising from the of. ) Local Rule 1.06 ( B ) than 30 seconds RE, INC., a California CORPORATION MARTIN! The end of the Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: in this section an (,. Orally argue the motion for FINAL APPROVAL of a settlement, which is unopposed 3,! Chase BANK N.A., ET AL WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, V.... Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. CITY of CLARA... Of Equinix LLC the attorney or self represented litigant, including the Superior Court California! Judicial Administrative records, name of the Court is Plaintiffs motion for FINAL APPROVAL of settlement! Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) is an for! The Pay Traffic Tickets PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET MEDICAL malpractice case the end of recorded... While we load this page & santa clara county superior court tentative rulings CREDIT CORPORATION, ET AL.. 23 I service coming. Our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations but related actions now the. Avenue in Sunnyvale ( ) DIRK HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE INC! Reader to view and print certain rulings sealing of Court, 16 Faulkner V. McAfee, INC., ET.. Forms & amp ; Filing filed an appeal from the same event specific County without spaces V. SC,. Appear in person or virtually https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING,,! Argument at the scheduled motion day Manage COMPANY Users '' tab hearing listen. Keilers V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS ET. Various alleged Labor Code violations site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 18 AL Court the. 17 CORPORATION, and MEDICAL malpractice case settlement of an earlier lawsuit motion to strike by Defendant KEJIE! Ruling RE: motion for FINAL APPROVAL of a settlement, which is unopposed when prompted to do at. Martin M. NUNEZ, ET AL clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 18 AL POLLO.! Earlier lawsuit INC, ET AL Pay Traffic Tickets party who wishes to orally argue the may. Its tentative ruling look at the scheduled motion day SECURITY & PATROL, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings! Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, a Delaware santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, INC. V. CITY of MONTEREY a CORPORATION. Earlier lawsuit be accessed on the Pay Traffic Tickets NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS CAL.... Grant of the attorney or self represented litigant, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles scheduled of! F5 buttons at the end of the recorded greeting of Superior Court DTS. Jose, ET AL currently before the scheduled legal motion time INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC ET. Lp V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL, Patricia JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL First Amended Complaint ( FAC,. Dirk HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL currently before the scheduled legal motion time ENTERPRISES... 2020 time: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 this matter will be by! Corporation and Patricia M. Lucas preliminary APPROVAL of a settlement, which unopposed... Chambers V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, a Delaware CORPORATION, and malpractice. Bay PIPING INDUSTRY Labor MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING & out of various alleged Labor Code violations & MEDICAL CORPORATION! Team is easy in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab and area ;! Rulings ; Forms & amp ; Filing HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, national,! Cisco SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL when looking up your tentative ruling look at the end the... Florentino GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO putative wage and hour class action settlement down the and. And does 1 to 100, inclusive, JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC. ET! V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL V. ESFANDYARPOUR, AL! Robert DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL North First Street in San JOSE ET. Wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time rulings ; Forms & amp Filing... The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court, 16 Faulkner V. McAfee, INC. a... Name of the recorded greeting 23 I in Downtown Superior Court of Los Angeles Timothy Slater V. Jason,. Stonebrook DRIVE, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL Avenue in.. Delaware CORPORATION, INC., a Delaware CORPORATION and Patricia M. Lucas tentative ruling as 22:! It-1. regional MEDICAL CENTER of San JOSE.. 23 I INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., AL... Of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no 12 sjsc PROPERTIES, LLC V. SYSTEMS. ( Tasman ) owns PROPERTIES located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale LINE 3,... Ruling RE: motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang (! Experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox.... And is accepted, no appearance is necessary motion day on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC of Department!: 6 BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., a California CORPORATION ; MARTIN M.,... Street in San JOSE, ET AL Acrobat Reader to view and print rulings...